Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear fellow selinux experts, > > selinux is at it again, this time, setroubleshoot shot out the warnings: > > > Summary: > > SELinux is preventing hal-acl-tool (hald_acl_t) "sys_resource" hald_acl_t. > > Detailed Description: > > SELinux denied access requested by hal-acl-tool. It is not expected that this > access is required by hal-acl-tool and this access may signal an intrusion > attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the > application is causing it to require additional access. > > Allowing Access: > > You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ > (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable > SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. > Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) > against this package. > > Additional Information: > > Source Context system_u:system_r:hald_acl_t:s0 > Target Context system_u:system_r:hald_acl_t:s0 > Target Objects None [ capability ] > Source hal-acl-tool > Source Path /usr/libexec/hal-acl-tool > Port <Unknown> > Host riohigh > Source RPM Packages hal-0.5.12-3.20081013git.fc10 > Target RPM Packages > Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.5.13-1.fc10 > Selinux Enabled True > Policy Type targeted > MLS Enabled True > Enforcing Mode Enforcing > Plugin Name catchall > Host Name riohigh > Platform Linux riohigh 2.6.27.3-27.rc1.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Sat > Oct 18 20:35:56 EDT 2008 i686 athlon > Alert Count 25 > First Seen Thu 16 Oct 2008 05:21:21 PM CDT > Last Seen Mon 20 Oct 2008 07:22:37 AM CDT > Local ID 2dda3b9b-7240-47c2-9865-4e1c1971771c > Line Numbers > > Raw Audit Messages > > node=riohigh type=AVC msg=audit(1224505357.902:104): avc: denied { sys_resource } for pid=3200 comm="hal-acl-tool" capability=24 scontext=system_u:system_r:hald_acl_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:hald_acl_t:s0 tclass=capability > > node=riohigh type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1224505357.902:104): arch=40000003 syscall=4 success=yes exit=2132 a0=4 a1=b7f94000 a2=854 a3=854 items=0 ppid=1873 pid=3200 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="hal-acl-tool" exe="/usr/libexec/hal-acl-tool" subj=system_u:system_r:hald_acl_t:s0 key=(null) > > > Summary: > > SELinux is preventing knotify4 from making the program stack executable. > > Detailed Description: > > The knotify4 application attempted to make its stack executable. This is a > potential security problem. This should never ever be necessary. Stack memory is > not executable on most OSes these days and this will not change. Executable > stack memory is one of the biggest security problems. An execstack error might > in fact be most likely raised by malicious code. Applications are sometimes > coded incorrectly and request this permission. The SELinux Memory Protection > Tests (http://people.redhat.com/drepper/selinux-mem.html) web page explains how > to remove this requirement. If knotify4 does not work and you need it to work, > you can configure SELinux temporarily to allow this access until the application > is fixed. Please file a bug report > (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) against this package. > > Allowing Access: > > Sometimes a library is accidentally marked with the execstack flag, if you find > a library with this flag you can clear it with the execstack -c LIBRARY_PATH. > Then retry your application. If the app continues to not work, you can turn the > flag back on with execstack -s LIBRARY_PATH. Otherwise, if you trust knotify4 to > run correctly, you can change the context of the executable to > unconfined_execmem_exec_t. "chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t > '/usr/bin/knotify4'" You must also change the default file context files on the > system in order to preserve them even on a full relabel. "semanage fcontext -a > -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t '/usr/bin/knotify4'" > > Fix Command: > > chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t '/usr/bin/knotify4' > > Additional Information: > > Source Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1 > 023 > Target Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1 > 023 > Target Objects None [ process ] > Source knotify4 > Source Path /usr/bin/knotify4 > Port <Unknown> > Host riohigh > Source RPM Packages kdebase-runtime-4.1.2-5.fc10 > Target RPM Packages > Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.5.13-1.fc10 > Selinux Enabled True > Policy Type targeted > MLS Enabled True > Enforcing Mode Enforcing > Plugin Name allow_execstack > Host Name riohigh > Platform Linux riohigh 2.6.27.3-27.rc1.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Sat > Oct 18 20:35:56 EDT 2008 i686 athlon > Alert Count 2 > First Seen Mon 20 Oct 2008 07:21:30 AM CDT > Last Seen Mon 20 Oct 2008 07:21:30 AM CDT > Local ID eebb1d00-400c-4898-888b-ae7a132cd800 > Line Numbers > > Raw Audit Messages > > node=riohigh type=AVC msg=audit(1224505290.544:95): avc: denied { execstack } for pid=2883 comm="knotify4" scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process > > node=riohigh type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1224505290.544:95): arch=40000003 syscall=125 success=no exit=-13 a0=bf983000 a1=1000 a2=1000007 a3=fffff000 items=0 ppid=1 pid=2883 auid=501 uid=501 gid=501 euid=501 suid=501 fsuid=501 egid=501 sgid=501 fsgid=501 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="knotify4" exe="/usr/bin/knotify4" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) > > > Summary: > > SELinux is preventing console-kit-dae (consolekit_t) "sys_resource" > consolekit_t. > > Detailed Description: > > SELinux denied access requested by console-kit-dae. It is not expected that this > access is required by console-kit-dae and this access may signal an intrusion > attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the > application is causing it to require additional access. > > Allowing Access: > > You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ > (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable > SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. > Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) > against this package. > > Additional Information: > > Source Context system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > Target Context system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 > Target Objects None [ capability ] > Source console-kit-dae > Source Path /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon > Port <Unknown> > Host riohigh > Source RPM Packages ConsoleKit-0.3.0-2.fc10 > Target RPM Packages > Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.5.13-1.fc10 > Selinux Enabled True > Policy Type targeted > MLS Enabled True > Enforcing Mode Enforcing > Plugin Name catchall > Host Name riohigh > Platform Linux riohigh 2.6.27.3-27.rc1.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Sat > Oct 18 20:35:56 EDT 2008 i686 athlon > Alert Count 23 > First Seen Thu 16 Oct 2008 04:27:59 PM CDT > Last Seen Mon 20 Oct 2008 07:20:39 AM CDT > Local ID 18c02e39-31cf-4b70-b999-fa910c61d822 > Line Numbers > > Raw Audit Messages > > node=riohigh type=AVC msg=audit(1224505239.547:88): avc: denied { sys_resource } for pid=1810 comm="console-kit-dae" capability=24 scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=capability > > node=riohigh type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1224505239.547:88): arch=40000003 syscall=4 success=yes exit=672 a0=1a a1=9fb1758 a2=2a0 a3=9fb1758 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1810 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="console-kit-dae" exe="/usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon" subj=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) > > > Summary: > > SELinux is preventing sm-notify (rpcd_t) "sys_resource" rpcd_t. > > Detailed Description: > > SELinux denied access requested by sm-notify. It is not expected that this > access is required by sm-notify and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. > It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the > application is causing it to require additional access. > > Allowing Access: > > You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ > (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable > SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. > Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) > against this package. > > Additional Information: > > Source Context unconfined_u:system_r:rpcd_t:s0 > Target Context unconfined_u:system_r:rpcd_t:s0 > Target Objects None [ capability ] > Source rpc.statd > Source Path /sbin/rpc.statd > Port <Unknown> > Host riohigh > Source RPM Packages nfs-utils-1.1.3-6.fc10 > Target RPM Packages > Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.5.12-2.fc10 > Selinux Enabled True > Policy Type targeted > MLS Enabled True > Enforcing Mode Enforcing > Plugin Name catchall > Host Name riohigh > Platform Linux riohigh 2.6.27-3.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Fri Oct 10 > 01:26:26 EDT 2008 i686 athlon > Alert Count 2 > First Seen Thu 16 Oct 2008 05:15:06 PM CDT > Last Seen Thu 16 Oct 2008 05:15:06 PM CDT > Local ID cc9a1241-41d6-4b07-aa8c-4d2701763004 > Line Numbers > > Raw Audit Messages > > node=riohigh type=AVC msg=audit(1224195306.728:103): avc: denied { sys_resource } for pid=7184 comm="sm-notify" capability=24 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:rpcd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:rpcd_t:s0 tclass=capability > > node=riohigh type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1224195306.728:103): arch=40000003 syscall=4 success=yes exit=5 a0=5 a1=bffbd700 a2=5 a3=5 items=0 ppid=7183 pid=7184 auid=500 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="sm-notify" exe="/usr/sbin/sm-notify" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:rpcd_t:s0 key=(null) > > > Which ones should I file bugs against, if there are any to file? > > I have seen knotify and selinux again, this one is filed. Do I need more info? > > Thanks, > > Antonio > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > fedora-selinux-list mailing list > fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list These should be filed against the kernel. These tools should not suddenly need sys_resource. I believe this is a kernel bug. -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
