On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:49 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > * How should the selinux policy module be versioned? Should it match > > the application versioning? Are there any restrictions on policy module > > version numbers? > > I don't think that policy numbers need bear any resemblance to the main > package version; I've added a note to that effect. I'm not sure what the > actual restrictions are on numbering, e.g whether any characters not in > the class [0-9.] are allowed. It can basically be any character; anything that works right with strverscmp(). For sanity we probably want to stick to [0-9a-z.]. Upstream refpolicy versioning is x.y.z, where z is incremented every time the module changes, y is incremented on a upstream release if the module has changed since the last release (i.e. z != 0), and x is incremented on major changes to the module. -- Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC (410) 290-1411 x150 -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
