On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 14:25 -0500, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 13:57 -0500, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote: > > Just to be clear, I should leave or remove the mydcc policy? > > Paul, > > I am getting errors when building the dcc and razor policies: I suppose that these are more correctly "warnings" since they do build... > dcc.if:23: duplicate definition of dcc_domtrans_cdcc(). Original definition on 23. > dcc.if:54: duplicate definition of dcc_run_cdcc(). Original definition on 54. > dcc.if:76: duplicate definition of dcc_domtrans_client(). Original definition on 76. > dcc.if:107: duplicate definition of dcc_run_client(). Original definition on 107. > dcc.if:129: duplicate definition of dcc_domtrans_dbclean(). Original definition on 129. > dcc.if:160: duplicate definition of dcc_run_dbclean(). Original definition on 160. > dcc.if:181: duplicate definition of dcc_stream_connect_dccifd(). Original definition on 181. > razor.if:101: duplicate definition of razor_common_domain_template(). Original definition on 101. > razor.if:197: duplicate definition of razor_per_userdomain_template(). Original definition on 197. > razor.if:218: duplicate definition of razor_domtrans(). Original definition on 218. > > The modules do seem to build and install however. > > I do believe that I answered my own question above, in that the dcc > policy will not load with the mydcc policy loaded. > > Current status: > > # semodule -l > amavis 1.0.4 > clamav 1.0.1 > dcc 1.0.0 > myclamscan 0.2.0 > mypyzor 0.2.1 > procmail 0.5.3 > pyzor 1.0.1 > razor 1.0.0 Just a quick note that so far, all seems to be well. No avclist msgs since the change in policies to the above. Want me back in Enforcing mode? Marc -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
