On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 16:59 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 16:12 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
<snip>
> >> Try this one:
> >>
> >> policy_module(myclamscan, 0.2.0)
> >>
> >> require {
> >> type clamscan_t;
> >> type postfix_local_t;
> >> type procmail_tmp_t;
> >> };
> >>
> >> # temp files
> >> # Included in selinux-policy-2.2.43-4
> >> #type clamscan_tmp_t;
> >> #files_tmp_file(clamscan_tmp_t)
> >>
> >> # Allow clamscan to create and use temp files and dirs
> >> # Included in selinux-policy-2.2.43-4
> >> #allow clamscan_t clamscan_tmp_t:dir create_dir_perms;
> >> #allow clamscan_t clamscan_tmp_t:file create_file_perms;
> >> #files_type(clamscan_tmp_t)
> >> #files_tmp_filetrans(clamscan_t, clamscan_tmp_t, { file dir })
> >>
> >> # Allow clamscan to read and write temp files created by procmail
> >> # (needed for clamassassin)
> >> allow clamscan_t procmail_tmp_t:file rw_file_perms;
> >>
> >> # Allow clamscan output to be piped back into the
> >> # postfix local delivery process
> >> allow clamscan_t postfix_local_t:fd use;
> >> allow clamscan_t postfix_local_t:fifo_file write;
> >
> > OK. Done.
> >
> > Also, just to confirm that you are explicitly changing the policy name
> > from myclam to myclamscan?
>
> Yes; I was helping someone else out on fedora-list and I renamed some
> things to avoid confusing myself.
No problem. Just wanted to be sure.
<snip>
> > BTW, I am now getting the following messages with avclist, since the
> > loading of the updated policies today:
> >
> > type=AVC msg=audit(1150817767.142:753): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2268 comm="spamd" name="pyzor" dev=hdc7 ino=3140757 scontext=system_u:system_r:spamd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:pyzor_exec_t:s0 tclass=file
> > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1150817767.142:753): arch=40000003 syscall=195 success=no exit=-13 a0=a22fb98 a1=92360c8 a2=4891eff4 a3=a22fb98 items=1 pid=2268 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=500 suid=0 fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=0 fsgid=500 comm="spamd" exe="/usr/bin/perl"type=AVC_PATH msg=audit(1150817767.142:753): path="/usr/bin/pyzor"
> > type=CWD msg=audit(1150817767.142:753): cwd="/"
> > type=PATH msg=audit(1150817767.142:753): item=0 name="/usr/bin/pyzor" flags=1 inode=3140757 dev=16:07 mode=0100755 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00
> > type=AVC msg=audit(1150817767.142:754): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2268 comm="spamd" name="pyzor" dev=hdc7 ino=3140757 scontext=system_u:system_r:spamd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:pyzor_exec_t:s0 tclass=file
> > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1150817767.142:754): arch=40000003 syscall=195 success=no exit=-13 a0=a22fb98 a1=92360c8 a2=4891eff4 a3=a22fb98 items=1 pid=2268 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=500 suid=0 fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=0 fsgid=500 comm="spamd" exe="/usr/bin/perl"type=AVC_PATH msg=audit(1150817767.142:754): path="/usr/bin/pyzor"
> > type=CWD msg=audit(1150817767.142:754): cwd="/"
> > type=PATH msg=audit(1150817767.142:754): item=0 name="/usr/bin/pyzor" flags=1 inode=3140757 dev=16:07 mode=0100755 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00
>
> Is pyzor working though?
>
> Maybe these can be dontaudit-ed if that's the case.
As Murphy's Law would dictate, no spam with pyzor hits since updating
the policies. The two or three that I have had so far, have no hits on
any of the remote tests.
As soon as I can confirm, I will post back.
Thanks,
Marc
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
