Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 07 juin 2006 à 19:38 -0500, Marc Schwartz a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
BTW (did I already wrote this?) it seems strange that on a postfix
+procmail+clamav+sa setup you wouldn't be using amavis, especailly since
it's available in FE
Nicolas,
No, you had not queried me on that previously.
When I set this approach up two or three years ago, I was looking for
something relatively easy to maintain, that was targeted to a relatively
low volume, single user system. I became aware of ClamAssassin via the
ClamAV third party apps web page and subsequent Google searches.
My readings of amavisd-new suggested that it was targeted more for
multi-user mail server configurations, given the more complex processing
options and reporting. Kind of along the lines of some of the other
mail::scanner classes of applications.
Ok. Since you never actually tried amavisd, and since you've proved
willing so far to invest some time in your spam config, I think you may
find it worth your time to try amavis. IMHO you'll find it's no more
difficult to setup than what you already did with procmail+clamassassin,
and is a quite a bit more powerful.
At least I did manage to install easily amavis way before it become
available in fedora, but failed miserably when investigating dcc
(granted the licensing was not too motivating in this last case)
Nicolas,
Fair enough. I'll take a more involved peek at it.
Thanks,
Marc
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
