Le mercredi 07 juin 2006 à 19:38 -0500, Marc Schwartz a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >> I have not yet had any Viagra-like e-mails to be able to test the other > >> remote servers (ie. pyzor, razor and DCC) to check for function. > >> Hopefully some with come through today (why can't you get them when you > >> want them.... ;-). > > > > > > BTW (did I already wrote this?) it seems strange that on a postfix > > +procmail+clamav+sa setup you wouldn't be using amavis, especailly since > > it's available in FE > > Nicolas, > > No, you had not queried me on that previously. > > When I set this approach up two or three years ago, I was looking for > something relatively easy to maintain, that was targeted to a relatively > low volume, single user system. I became aware of ClamAssassin via the > ClamAV third party apps web page and subsequent Google searches. > > My readings of amavisd-new suggested that it was targeted more for > multi-user mail server configurations, given the more complex processing > options and reporting. Kind of along the lines of some of the other > mail::scanner classes of applications. Ok. Since you never actually tried amavisd, and since you've proved willing so far to invest some time in your spam config, I think you may find it worth your time to try amavis. IMHO you'll find it's no more difficult to setup than what you already did with procmail+clamassassin, and is a quite a bit more powerful. At least I did manage to install easily amavis way before it become available in fedora, but failed miserably when investigating dcc (granted the licensing was not too motivating in this last case) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
