On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 10:53 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 5/20/06, Martin Ebourne <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 08:22 -0500, Justin Conover wrote: > > > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/darren?entry=dear_ibm_please_consider_trusted > > > > > > I thought this was interesting. Yeah, I use Solaris to so I read some > > > Sun blogs too. :) > > > > High on opinion, low on fact. > > > > Just how was that interesting? As a measure of desperation? > > > > It is low on fact, but in some ways is influential as Darren is a well > known security person. On a cost area it does have an item that many > business managers may have to look at: > > Solaris is EAL4+ with various subsets already and is a known quantity. > SeLinux implementations are not by themselves EAL4+.. a companies > version might be in the future but not now. Validated products: http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/vpl/vpl_type.html#operatingsystem http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/public/consumer/index.php?menu=4&orderindex=1&showcatagories=256 Products in evaluation: http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/in_evaluation.html -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
