On 5/20/06, Martin Ebourne <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 08:22 -0500, Justin Conover wrote: > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/darren?entry=dear_ibm_please_consider_trusted > > I thought this was interesting. Yeah, I use Solaris to so I read some > Sun blogs too. :) High on opinion, low on fact. Just how was that interesting? As a measure of desperation?
It is low on fact, but in some ways is influential as Darren is a well known security person. On a cost area it does have an item that many business managers may have to look at: Solaris is EAL4+ with various subsets already and is a known quantity. SeLinux implementations are not by themselves EAL4+.. a companies version might be in the future but not now. And if you are doing end of fiscal year purchasing.. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
