On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:18 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > texrel_shlib_t is I believe an alias for textrel_shlib_t. Is it just > there for historical reasons to support a typo someone made whilst > developing policy? texrel_shlib_t was the original name of the type, and it was renamed to textrel_shlib_t. texrel_shlib_t is an alias of textrel_shlib_t for compatibility. > There are still some instances of texrel_shlib_t in the policy: [cut] > Should these really be textrel_shlib_t or am I missing something subtle? They should, but it doesn't hurt for them to be texrel_shlib_t since its an alias of textrel_shlib_t. I have fixed these in upstream refpolicy. -- Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC (410) 290-1411 x150 -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
