On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 10:30 -0700, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: > I think it all comes down to different societal etiquettes. I have > seen this a lot in mergers of organizations and companies. Both sides > claim that the proper way to run mailling lists is either to > "Reply-To-All" by mailling list or manually. They each come up with > straw men arguments since there doesnt seem to be a IETF RFC on > mailing list management. > > I personally find it all to be at the level of religous arguments > about how many times to genuflect and at what. Misses the whole > purpose and just causes people to figure out who their "clan" is. Summarized nicely by: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html versus http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml Of course, the first opinion is the correct one ;) -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
