On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 02:11 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:58:41 +0100, > Dawid Gajownik <gajownik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > BTW maybe mailman should be configured to always send replies to > > fedora-selinux-list (like on other fedora-*-lists)? I quite often forget > > to hit "Reply All" button ;) > > The normal way to respond to lists is using reply all. > > The other lists are the ones that are broken. (Fortunately it isn't > too hard to strip off the reply-to headers, but the lists still break > the normal use of the reply-to headers.) The other fedora lists appear to munge the Reply-To: header such that the list address is added to any existing Reply-To: header if present, thus honouring the intent of the poster's Reply-To: header. Requiring the use of Reply-All usually results in posters getting two copies of each reply, one privately and one from the list, which I'd find really annoying if I wasn't deleting duplicate messages using procmail. I still have to go to the trouble of removing the OP's address and moving the list address from the Cc: field to the To: field whenever I reply to anything on this list. I certainly prefer the fedora-list method personally. Paul. -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
