Hi; Thx for the Hint (amvis ports). I stick with clamsmtp since its working quite well 4 me. Its a little C Programm without overhead (vs interpreter), no dependence flood (perl modules) and i am not so much a perl fan .... hb Am Sonntag, den 12.03.2006, 00:26 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: > Le samedi 11 mars 2006 à 10:01 -0500, Daniel J Walsh a écrit : > > Holger Burde wrote: > > > Hi; > > > > > > FC 4 currrent with targeted - up2date & unmodified. > > > > > > The postfix Policy or some other seems 2 prevent binding postfix to > > > unpriv Ports > 1023 (10026 in my case). Is this intentional and if why ? > > > Daemon based Filtering stuff needs those high-ports. > > > Since after setting setenforce to 0 it works i think i must be policy > > > related (the system has no source policy - so i didn't dig into that > > > yet). > > > > > > Mar 11 14:06:40 proton postfix/master[3413]: fatal: bind 127.0.0.1 port > > > 10026: Permission denied > > > > > Well you have two choices. You can update to FC5 and use some of the > > semanage to add additional ports > > to postfix. > > Actually this is a postfix/filter communication problem, it works fine > in FC4/5 with postfix<->amavid-new, so what you actually need is use the > same ports as amavisd-new and eventually apply amavis contexts to your > filter > > (another solution is to just use amavisd-new now it's in FE) > -- --- -- - Dipl. Inform. H. Burde EMail : <hburde@xxxxxxxxxxx>| <hburde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
