Hi; FC 4 currrent with targeted - up2date & unmodified. The postfix Policy or some other seems 2 prevent binding postfix to unpriv Ports > 1023 (10026 in my case). Is this intentional and if why ? Daemon based Filtering stuff needs those high-ports. Since after setting setenforce to 0 it works i think i must be policy related (the system has no source policy - so i didn't dig into that yet). Mar 11 14:06:40 proton postfix/master[3413]: fatal: bind 127.0.0.1 port 10026: Permission denied No avc denies (audit2allow) - strange and not funny .. if its policy related. PS I use some of my own RPMs (clamsmtp & anomy ..) with Postfix (FC4) & Clamav (FC4 extras) which works beside this Port Problem. Since selinux is part of my security Concept setenforce 0 is no option. hb -- --- -- - Dipl. Inform. H. Burde EMail : <hburde@xxxxxxxxxxx>| <hburde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
