Bjorn Victor wrote: > On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:50:45 +0100 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> W. Scott Wilburn wrote: >> >>> Since the problem occurred with a spamassassin update, not selinux, I >>> assume something in the behavior of spamassassin has changed. >> There is a boatload of spamassassin+selinux problems in bugzilla, I'm >> not sure Dan will have the time to fix them before FC5, let alone look >> at FC4 problems. >> >> Spamassassin does so many things (resolves names, writes in user homes, >> launches pluggins like pyzor/razor, some client/server spamc/spamd >> stuff...) from so many contexts (procmail, user, mta...) it seems every >> single policy/spamassassin update breaks something. > > Any advise on how to make spamassassin/spamd work (without disabling > SElinux entirely) would be very welcome. Report AVCs in bugzilla, confirm existing bugs, etc -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
