On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:50:45 +0100 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > W. Scott Wilburn wrote: > >> Since the problem occurred with a spamassassin update, not selinux, I >> assume something in the behavior of spamassassin has changed. > > There is a boatload of spamassassin+selinux problems in bugzilla, I'm > not sure Dan will have the time to fix them before FC5, let alone look > at FC4 problems. > > Spamassassin does so many things (resolves names, writes in user homes, > launches pluggins like pyzor/razor, some client/server spamc/spamd > stuff...) from so many contexts (procmail, user, mta...) it seems every > single policy/spamassassin update breaks something. Any advise on how to make spamassassin/spamd work (without disabling SElinux entirely) would be very welcome. -- Bjorn -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
