Re: MCS -- some comments for discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Gene Czarcinski wrote:

> 2.  As I see it, MCS is "simply" another type of ACL but one which (to me) is 
> a better design (more useable) than the existing ACL capability.  However, 
> whereas I can categorize (protect) both files and directories with ACL, I can 
> currently only categorize (protect) files (not directories) with MCS.  I 
> consider this to be a problem/deficiency.
> 
> Consider that when I create new application files (e.g, with openoffice.org), 
> they will not have a category assigned by default.  This could leave a 
> sensitive file available for others to access.  With directory protection, 
> this could be mitigated.

Yes, inheriting a directory's categories on file creation (only) is 
something we'll probably investigate soon.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux