Le dimanche 06 novembre 2005 à 04:33 +0100, Alexander Dalloz a écrit : > What I would like to know - besides resolving the ticketed problem - is > whether such kind of packages from Fedora Extras will have to carry > policy modifications / adds themselves or whether approved FE packages > should come up with Core policy package adjustments. My understanding in the FC core policy can be updated on request when the need is clear. Also, pam_abl has been suggested as a future core component and was not rejected, but put on the backburner, which suggests some period of testing in extras is wished by Red Hat. This testing won't happen if the package is blocked by default selinux policy. However it's up to Daniel and the Red Hat selinux team to decide this. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
