On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 12:30 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:26 -0700, Todd Merritt wrote: > > It's getting in there from somewhere: > > > > [root@tubb policy]# grep allow policy.conf |grep ua_pw_user_r > > allow user_r ua_pw_user_r; > > allow sysadm_r ua_pw_user_r; > > > > But, after switching it to full_user role > > > > allow system_r ua_pw_user_r; > > > > is added to the policy and everything works. > > The issue isn't the allow rule - it is the missing role statement, i.e. > role ua_pw_user_r types ua_pw_user_t; > I realized that after I fired off the message, sorry about that. -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list