On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 11:57 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > Doesn't look like limited_user_role() adds a: > role $1_r types $1_t; > statement to authorize the role for the type. Looks like the corresponding statement for full_user_role() is pushed all the way down to user_domain(). Likely should be brought up to limited_user_role() and thereby included in both limited_user_role() and full_user_role() at that level. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
