On Tuesday 10 May 2005 01:25, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > I remember seeing a statement on a RedHat page that their "lack of support" > would basically mean "replicate your issue with enforcing=0 and then we'll > talk", so things may not be as bad as all that... It's a matter of reproduce with targeted policy, reproduce with selinux=0 or maybe reproduce with enforcing=0 (NB enforcing=0 still has some small potential to break things). Also the exact details of how the problem must be reproduced will be negotiated with the support person. For example if "ls" didn't display file details correctly you should not be required to reboot with enforcing=0. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
