On Mon, 09 May 2005 08:36:08 PDT, Erik Fichtner said: > And if they're not going to support it, they might as well not ship it > in RHEL. Once you're running an unsupported configuration, one might > as well do it for free. ;) Umm.. *every* vendor does this. You post to linux-kernel with an oops that's tainted by the NVidia module, they'll ask you to replicate without that module loaded. I place a hardware support call to Dell, and they want to rule out any add-in PCI cards I've stuck in there myself. The IBM service manuals for an RS/6000 start with (basically) "gut the machine down to a minimum bootable config (ascii display, 4M memory, CD/ROM) and add stuff back till it breaks again". The *important* part is that if I have a *NON*-Selinux problem, I can still get support. The only service call I had to make against RHEL3 was a botch in the aacraid drivers causing a panic on SMP when insmod'ed at system boot. Would have *royally* sucked if they had said "Won't support that config". I don't see what the issue with RedHat saying "We won't answer questions if it looks like an SELinux policy that *you* installed is part of the problem".
Attachment:
pgp88erjNOM36.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
