Re: senlinux configuration, are you sure it's the right way?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Farkas Levente wrote:

Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Also from Red Hat's perspective having policy sources installed gives us


major headaches for support. If users start moving
files into/out of unused directories, things are going to start breaking. We don't want some support call because someone decided
to try out the latest wizbang policy, and it broke their ABC


this can happend now with /etc/selinux directory too...

Application. Also policy sources requires a full build environment to work.
Make, M4, checkpolicy ... On a minimal install machine this is a big overhead.


i see, that's a bigger problem:-(((
so the only solution that package creator should have this enviroment and he has to include binary application specific policy in the binary rpm. which currently can't be added/loaded into the system (could it?). so we have to wait for trsys:-(((


The only solution now would be to require policy-sources to be installed and then add their policy to it.

Dan

--



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux