senlinux configuration, are you sure it's the right way?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,
after i having played a few days with selinux, apache and other daemons and programs the whole selinux configuration seems to me a bit confusing. if i found any kind of problem with the "default" selinux setup which is not big thing since most systems are different and there are a lots of program which are not included in the core distro. i have to report it and the next update will include it. my question why selinux include the default policies? why selinux-policy-* contains the right acces rights for all included deamons, programs? wouldn't it be much better to all package include it's own policy and in the rpm postinstall session reload/add/modify the new policies. this is something similar to the libs. i only install only those lib which needed for me and at the postinstall session run an ldconfig. i wouldn't like to install all libs! why should i install policies for eg. apache when i don't run apache? why should i update selinux-policy-* just because there was a bug in the apache part of the policy when i don't run apache? the current case is something one big monolitic policy configuration which most of the time not suitable for anyone (anyone who run anything else then the default need to modify it or run any webscript or). of course my main problem not with apache policies rather then the whole system and way of configuration of selinux. wouldn't be any easier and modularized way to use selinux and configure it for the needed thing. probably there is need for some core policy but all others policy can be modularized. or do i missed something?
just my 2c.
yours.


--
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux