FYI... Just incase anyone wants to create there own kernel running on there box. Grabbing and applying all the patches from the latest kernel.src.rpm worked for me on a ck2 kernel. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:48:24 -0500, Justin Conover <justin.conover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So basically I can install the .src.rpm for the latest Fedora Kernel > and use the patch from my /rpmbuild/SOURCES/patch--2.6.9-final.bz2 or > bk2 or both? > > > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:21:21 -0500, Justin Conover > <justin.conover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thats fine, I really just wanted to build a reiser4 dir to chroot a > > different linux install. I'll just use ext3/xfs instead. Well, > > atleast SElinux worked for saying NO to a different kenrel ;-) > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:03:54 -0400, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 13:49 -0500, Justin Conover wrote: > > > > After I built a new kernel based of of ck-overloaded, I rebooted and a > > > > ton of SELinux errors/messages, kept comeing across the screen? > > > > > > I recommend you don't rebuild arbitrary kernel versions and patch sets > > > with SELinux enabled. The security of the system depends on tight > > > coordination between the kernel, policy, and various packages. In > > > Fedora we do the integration ensure that this all just works. > > > > > > > What > > > > do need to do to make a home-grown-kernel work with SELinux. > > > > > > Most likely you're missing the tmpfs xattr patch in this case. > > > > > > -- > > > fedora-selinux-list mailing list > > > fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list > > > > > >
