Re: SELinux and stunnel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:49, "W. Michael Petullo" <mike@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am using stunnel to create an encrypted tunnel for SMTP connections to
> my ISP.  I have configured xinetd to execute stunnel appropriately when a
> connection is made to localhost:465.  This has stopped working when using
> recent strict policies.  I now see the following errors in my system logs:

inetd_child_t has access to /dev/urandom.  If stunnel is labelled as 
inetd_child_exec_t then things should just work for you.

Is stunnel commonly used in any other way than through inetd?  If not then 
we'll just change the default policy to label it as inetd_child_exec_t.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux