Aleksey Nogin wrote:
Looks like a bug in matchpathcon (Which is used buy restorecon). It is returning the wrong security context. I will send this to stephen. Basically looks like it is ignoring file type.On 18.05.2004 19:22, Gary Peck wrote:
For some reason restorecon and setfiles have different notions of what context certain files should be. For example:
[...]
So, restorecon thinks that *.so files should be shlib_t, whereas setfiles thinks they should be lib_t. Which one is right and why do they disagree? I thought that they both get their context info from the same place.
It seems the two disagree on symlinks. May be restorecon forgets to check whether its argument is a symlink?
Dan
