Re: restorecon vs. setfiles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18.05.2004 19:22, Gary Peck wrote:

For some reason restorecon and setfiles have different notions of what
context certain files should be. For example:
[...]
So, restorecon thinks that *.so files should be shlib_t, whereas
setfiles thinks they should be lib_t. Which one is right and why do they
disagree? I thought that they both get their context info from the same
place.

It seems the two disagree on symlinks. May be restorecon forgets to check whether its argument is a symlink?


--
Aleksey Nogin

Home Page: http://nogin.org/
E-Mail: nogin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (office), aleksey@xxxxxxxxx (personal)
Office: Jorgensen 70, tel: (626) 395-2907

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux