Re: packaging an alternate dictionary for cracklibs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 15:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:11:50PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Each subpackage can have virtual Provides+Conflicts to indicate one
> > *must* be installed:
> > 
> > Provides: cracklib-dictionaries
> > Conflicts: cracklib-dictionaries
> > 
> > Then cracklib itself can do the following:
> > 
> > Requires: cracklib-dictionaries
> > Suggests: cracklib-dicts-10k-worst
> > 
> > And cracklib-dicts-full (replacing old cracklib-dicts) would do the
> > following:
> > 
> > Obsoletes: cracklib-dicts < %{version}-%{release}
> > Provides: cracklib-dictionaries
> > Conflicts: cracklib-dictionaries
> 
> Is there a way for subpackages to actually contain different files
> with the
> same path/name?
> 

My initial reaction is I'd be inclined to use 'alternatives'[1] to
achieve this.... 

Pat


[1] https://github.com/fedora-sysv/chkconfig
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux