On 07. 04. 20 12:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
When you use %python_provide and when you build the package with the new
generator, the provides are listed twice:
$ rpm -qp --provides python3-double-provides-0-0.fc33.noarch.rpm
python-double-provides = 0-0.fc33
python-double-provides = 0-0.fc33
python3-double-provides = 0-0.fc33
python38-double-provides = 0-0.fc33
python38-double-provides = 0-0.fc33
$ rpmlint python3-double-provides-0-0.fc33.noarch.rpm
...
python3-double-provides.noarch: E: useless-provides python-double-provides
python3-double-provides.noarch: E: useless-provides python38-double-provides
...
I've reported that as a bug in RPM:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1166
Apparently, there is a good reason to not have those merged. People are notified
of the uselessness of the manual one. I'll take that into account when amending
the guidelines.
I recommend to remove the manual %python_provide calls for package names on
rawhide+.
It is "safe" to keep them for "single-spec" experience: The problem does no
harm, createrepo_c merges those provides at the end.
If you like to have a single spec and don't want the rpmlint error, you can wrap
the call in %{?!__pythonname_provides: }.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
