Re: Does every package which provides a library requires to provide unversioned copy of the library?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 01:57:38PM -0000, Mattia Verga wrote:
> does every package which provides a library requires to provide unversioned
> copy of the library?

It does not need. But that makes the library pretty hostile to a standard use
of a dynamic library and that is a linking to it at build time.

> Here the libpasraw library only provides versioned
> copy of the library. It's just a private library which is used only by other
> projects from the same author which require the library only at runtime.
> 
Then the library should not be installed into the standard path (%{_libdir}).
If the file is not for a public use, it only polutes the name space.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux