Re: Ideas and proposal for removing changelog and release fields from spec file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:46 AM clime <clime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 12:05, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > If you don’t keep things decentralized you’ll be in a word of pain when
> > the scm or buildsys needs to be changed for another implementation (not
> > to mention, that’s not a good way to collaborate with other distros).
> > That will happen eventually. Web apps are not eternal.
>
> Full decentralization likely means that everyone has its own git repo
> and we can only sync by mailing list. I think src.fp.o is a good point
> where things can be done and where we can agree on what the packages
> that Fedora produce are (meaning we need a canonical source of package
> sources, otherwise it would be more complex to put a distribution
> together).
>

This is not true. Pagure accepts PRs from arbitrary Git servers just
fine via the remote PR feature, so we do support decentralized
workflows without resorting to sending patches via email or Bugzilla.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux