Re: Doubt about explicit compiler mention in the BuildRequires field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 27 February 2020 00:35:34 CET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> I am asking this about
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
> 
> Is the requirement that we should explicit state the compiler or is it
> enough 
 to have it implicitly.
> 
> Case in point, R binary packages.
> 
> Each package requires R-devel. Now R-devel requires R-core-devel that
> requires 
 gcc-c++
> gcc-gfortran
> 
> So the BuildRequires for gcc-c++ is there but implicitly.
> 
> If the requirement is for the BuildRequires to be explicit then it should be
> 
 said that explicitly in the guidelines page. As an example in the
> "Packaging Q&A" section.
> 
> What do you think? Regards,
> -- 
> José Abílio
> 

As a reviewer, I only require it for C/C++ only packages, not R, Perl or 
Python for example.

Best regards,

Robert-André

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux