Re: abidiff for C++ binary libraries that are local to a project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Brad,

as far as I know abidiff reports on taskotron will not block your
package, so if you have a strong suspicion that the report is faulty or
irrelevant, then afaik you can just ignore it.


Hope this helps,

Dan

Brad Bell <bradbell@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I have a C++ package where the user API is all include files.
> There is a small binary library that is used by the include files, but not in the user API.
>
> I have gotten a abidiff error report
> https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/dde97378-3ed6-11ea-a59a-525400364adf/tests.yml/cppad-20200000.0-2.fc32.log
>
> This failure is also strange because I did not change anything that would affect the library between 
> the versions that gave this message.
>
> How does one proceed in a case like this ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux