Re: libfoo.$major requirements/guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "BJM" == Brian J Murrell <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

BJM> It's a pity though.

I don't agree; to do so would be mostly useless complexity.  You are
certainly welcome to break libraries out in your packages, and there are
good reasons for doing so which are covered in the guidelines.  (Hence
the number of "-libs" packages.)  But it is not generally required.

BJM> As not requiring it is going to prevent the future need (some day)
BJM> of having both major versions installed to bridge a major version
BJM> transition gap while software catches up to using the new major
BJM> version of the library.

And yet we do that all the time.

 - J<
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux