Re: time of day in RPM changelogs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
>RFC 3339/ISO 8601 timestamps are absolutely awful, since
>no one can read them.

Hello, I am no one.

RFC 3339 is intended for text-based communication protocols, not for
user interfaces, but it is at least a specification that can be
followed.

The month-day-year order is silly, inserting the time of day in the
middle of the date is even sillier, and using a three- or four-letter
code instead of a numeric offset from UTC is just dumb, but the real
problem with RPM's time format is that I can't find a document that
specifies what the format is. The problem with the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines is that it's unclear whether the policy mandates exactly the
date format shown in the examples.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpIKcFDWcNUP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux