>>>>> "MH" == Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
MH> Should %license always be specified relative and installed to
MH> /usr/share/licenses like this:
MH> %license LICENSE
MH> Or is it totally OK to specify it absolutely like this:
MH> %license %{_whatnot}/%{name}/LICENSE
As far as I understand things, both are quite OK. If the upstream build
system actually installs the license file as part of %make_install then
you would certainly mark that instead of making another copy. Otherwise
you could use the first form. I know of no requirement that the license
files actually be placed in %_licensedir.
- J<
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
