|
Sorry, but this completely miss the point and unfortunately your
view is quite limited.
For example, we have rubygem-uglifier, rubygem-jquery-rails,
rubygem-coffee-script etc, which originally bundles JS libraries,
but thanks to js-* counterparts, we were able unbundle them. If we
have not unbundled them yet, it is typically because nobody
bothered to follow the guidelines and provide the correct js-
packages.
V.
Dne 4.8.2018 v 01:17 Greg Sheremeta
napsal(a):
Hi,
This page
is terribly outdated. Even when it was created years ago,
IMO the advice was questionable. Today, it's definitely bad
advice.
Modern web applications use webpack for _javascript_. With
webpack, _javascript_ is minified and bundled, and sometimes
assets are even injected. I realize bundling libraries is bad
for an old-school RPM-based application. But no one packages
_javascript_ into RPMs (try to find react and friends), and the
page is leading to confusion on my team.
To prevent confusion, acceptable options would be: either
simply deleting the page, or placing a giant "don't follow
this outdated advice" banner at the top.
Best wishes,
Greg
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/J4LSN4I5YQA4HHTE6PM3JCOZ57YX5XDE/
|
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/W3ETAVYCJ24GCPUJFX6YG6WCI5ZRFCRK/
