On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 14:35 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "SS" == Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > SS> I haven't found any Fedora Packaging rules or otherwise any > SS> recommendation on transforming a PEP440 package version number to an > SS> RPM NVR. > > Don't the existing versioning guidelines already cover this, though? I > don't see how they fail to do so. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release > > Isn't that pretty much what you describe? (Except that in the very last > case should be name-0.2.0-2.post1 because the release integer must > always increment.) I was looking for something specific to PEP 440 equivalence/normalization rules, I guess there aren't and there is no interest in being overly prescriptive for this case ? The common rules do allow me to create packages that will update properly though, and I can certainly figure out my way in the ambiguous cases, so they suffice for the time being. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
