Re: Python PEP 440 and RPM Versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "SS" == Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

SS> I haven't found any Fedora Packaging rules or otherwise any
SS> recommendation on transforming a PEP440 package version number to an
SS> RPM NVR.

Don't the existing versioning guidelines already cover this, though?  I
don't see how they fail to do so.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release

Isn't that pretty much what you describe?  (Except that in the very last
case should be name-0.2.0-2.post1 because the release integer must
always increment.)

 - J<
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux