Re: Hacks for multilib unclean C headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:28:05 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> PR> Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
> PR> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
> 
> Why would you bump a three year old ticket for this?

Jason, because that's what you suggested while you were previously closing
the ticket, and also because the ticket covered it all.  Original purpose
of the ticket was to hear FPC's opinion about this.

> Just open a new one.

Having a new ticket just to hear opinions would just make me to copy
basically everything (anybody would still have to look at the older one).
So I stop here.

The new ticket, to me, should be about MultilibTricks draft ratification,
but we are obviously not there yet.

As we talk about "draft only" stuff and there is no clear vote against
that change (from FPC), I'll simply try to edit the draft once the
'multilib-rpm-config' package [1] gets reviewed.  I can then submit FPC
ticket (and edit [2] accordingly) asking for adding 'Requires:
multilib-rpm-config' into 'redhat-rpm-config'.  Merging whole thing
afterwards into 'redhat-rpm-config' would just be trivial playing with
Provides/Requires.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344231
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286193

Thanks,
Pavel
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux