Am Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:10:05 -0500
schrieb Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
> <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Link Dupont <link@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 19:42 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >>> On 01/10/2016 07:37 PM, Link Dupont wrote:
> >>> > I'm packaging a game that uses scons as its build system. The
> >>> > default SConstruct file puts the game binary
> >>> > in /usr/games/%{name}, and the data files
> >>> > under /usr/share/games/%{name}. I searched the wiki for usage
> >>> > guidelines around /usr/games, but couldn't find any results
> >>> > that tell me whether /usr/games and /usr/share/games are
> >>> > recommended paths for Fedora.
> >>> >
> >>> > Are /usr/games and /usr/share/games the correct place for games
> >>> > to install their binary and data, or should I patch the
> >>> > SConstruct file to install into /usr/bin and /usr/share/%{name}?
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> These guidelines are dated but still valid I think:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging
> >
> > It also matches the File Hierarchy System at
> > http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.pdf .
>
> /usr/games is still in the spec. Look at page 25 of that PDF.
>
It's only for static data files and it's optional.
That's exactly what the guidelines say, but they also say it's
recommended not to use it for consistency with other packages.
Jens
Attachment:
pgpdrZ2hDpGfW.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
