Re: python-macros review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 30.12.2015 v 23:13 Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> On 12/30/2015 02:48 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I've submitted a review for a separate python-macros package here:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904
>>>
>>> This is what the FPC approved here
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567#comment:12 to be added to the Fedora
>>> buildroots to provide the %python3_pkgversion macro needed for compatibility
>>> with the EPEL Python3 packaging guidelines.
>>>
>>> It also serves the much more important goal of getting the python macros out
>>> of the the individual python? packages to make it easier to update them.
>>>
>> Don't we normally name these something to the effect of
>> "<name>-srpm-macros"? For example, we have "go-srpm-macros" and
>> "perl-srpm-macros". Shouldn't this be named "python-srpm-macros" for
>> consistency purposes?
> I guess you're right, though we have a mix at the moment:
>
> blender-rpm-macros.noarch            1:2.76-2.fc24              rawhide
> erlang-rpm-macros.noarch             0.1.4-2.fc23               rawhide
> ghc-rpm-macros.x86_64                1.4.15-3.fc23              rawhide
> ghc-srpm-macros.noarch               1.4.2-2.fc23               rawhide
> gnat-srpm-macros.noarch              2-1.fc23                   rawhide
> go-srpm-macros.noarch                2-3.fc24                   rawhide
> kde-apps-rpm-macros.noarch           6:4.14.15-3.fc24           rawhide
> kernel-rpm-macros.noarch             36-1.fc24                  rawhide
> kf5-rpm-macros.noarch                5.17.0-2.fc24              rawhide
> ocaml-srpm-macros.noarch             2-3.fc23                   rawhide
> perl-srpm-macros.noarch              1-17.fc23                  rawhide
>
> And some just "-macros":
>
> perl-macros.x86_64                  4:5.22.1-355.fc24          koji
> python-macros.noarch                2.7.11-1.fc24              koji
> python3-pkgversion-macros.noarch    1-5.fc24                   koji
> sip-macros.noarch                   4.17-3.fc24                koji
>
> But it does look like it is the *-srpm-macros that tend to be in the buildroot.
>


And we have rubygem-devel and ruby-devel shipping some macros. I can
hardly understand why the packages should be in separate pacakge and why
there should be (s)rpm or macros mentioned.


Vít
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux