Am 29.12.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Jason L Tibbitts III: > In: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function > > the current packaging guidelines include mention of > /etc/bash_completion.d as an example of how to get multiple ownership of > a directory correct. The problem is that that directory is now part of > the filesystem packages (and so shouldn't be multiply owned) and that's > not even the correct location for bash completion files these days. > > I could just remove it, but I'd like to replace it with a more correct > example. Problem is, I can't think of one. Anyone have a better > directory to use to illustrate this? > An example could be /usr/share/gtk-doc, although there was also an attempt [1] some years ago to let it own by the "filesystem" package. Currently on my system (with just a few GTK apps and no -devel packages of them) it is owned by just one package, but I remember some years ago with the Gnome development stack installed it was owned by multiple packages. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-June/007170.html Best Regards, Mario -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
