On Wednesday, 08 October 2014 at 17:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:52:45PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:48:30 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > Could just using Provides: python3-aiohttp suffice? > > > > > > Building two binaries for the same python stack seems a little bit of a waste of > > > resources. > > > > Why two? > > > > python-aiohttp src.rpm does not need to build a package for %name. > > It can build "subpackages" with other names. > > Ah ok. I had mis-understanding your idea, should work and reflect reality nicely Exactly. If you have an empty %files section for the main package (or none at all) and populate just %files -n python3-aiohttp, you'll end up with one binary package with a correct name. Regards, -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
