On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:46:43 +0200, Fabian Affolter wrote: > > > Recently I created a package python-aiohttp and this package was > > approved, imported, and built. But I made a mistake and took the wrong > > name for the package. > > The package runs only with Python 3. As pointed out in the review > > request [1] the correct name should be python3-aiohttp. > > > > Do I need to open a rename request to fix that? > > I'm not convinced it is the "wrong name". Note that you could still > build a binary python3-aiohttp package from a python-aiohttp src.rpm! > That's what dozens (hundreds?) of other Python Module packages do, > either because they build for multiple versions of Python or because > they had been added a long time before Python 3 became available. > > => I would keep it as is and not worry too much, but make sure you > use the python3- prefix for the binary builds to adhere to the > guidelines. Could just using Provides: python3-aiohttp suffice? Building two binaries for the same python stack seems a little bit of a waste of resources. Pierre -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
