On 24/06/14 09:04, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
can someone have a look on to the attached rpm spec file, is the
release tag ok for the new
rc1 release.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines
Erstellt:
/home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/speed-dreams-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.src.rpm
Erstellt:
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/speed-dreams-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
Erstellt:
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/speed-dreams-robots-base-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.noarch.rpm
Erstellt:
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/speed-dreams-devel-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
Erstellt:
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/speed-dreams-debuginfo-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
the rpm spec file is attached.
No, you have a release tag starting with "17.", whilst pre-release
versions should start with "0." - see the pre-release naming guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
If you want to include the svn revision number then you should also
follow the snapshot guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
You probably want something like 2.1.0-0.17.rc1 or
2.1.0-0.17.20140619svn5781.rc1
However, if you have previously built a 2.1.0 pre-release with a
non-zero release number, using the zero prefix would break the upgrade
path so you'd have to consider either continuing with
guidelines-breaking release numbers or using an epoch.
Paul.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
