> * Please consider requiring AppData for all desktop applications - > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/414 (spot, 16:21:21) > * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/414#comment:3 > (abadger1999, 16:22:49) > * In the guidelines about adding AppData, please include the > requirement for metadata licenses to match the upstream code license > if we're creating the AppData file. (abadger1999, 17:07:28) Well, I'm not quite sure I got the point. From [1]: > <metadata_license/> > > The <metadata_license> tag is indicating the content license that you > are releasing the AppData text file and screenshots as. This is not > typically the same as the project license. (...) Permissible license > codes include: > > CC0-1.0 > CC-BY-3.0 > (...) > > The old name for this tag was <licence/> and was changed for two > reasons. It used the British English spelling, and also that it > wasn't clear that the license given wasn't the project license, but > rather the license for the metadata only. > > <project_license/> > > The <project_license> tag is indicating the licenses that you used > for the application and any data or media files used. This is not > typically the same as the metadata license. (...) I.e. metadata license to be the same as upstream code license is not possible, giving that only *content* licenses are valid for this tag. Also read: > This is not typically the same as the project license. Giving that, I'd say your proposition is wrong. [1] http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/ -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
