Re: Addon Packages General Naming policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Addon Packages General Naming policy
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:48:17 +0800
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130809181131.617acf0d@faldor.intranet>
References: <20130809181131.617acf0d@faldor.intranet>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

They both add -vim as sub package

IMO if a syntax file is shipped in pkg, pkg-vim is OK.

Sent from Note I

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Addon Packages General Naming policy
  - From: Matthias Runge
- Re: Addon Packages General Naming policy
  - From: T.C. Hollingsworth

References:
- Addon Packages General Naming policy
  - From: Michael Schwendt

Prev by Date: Addon Packages General Naming policy
Next by Date: Re: Addon Packages General Naming policy
Previous by thread: Addon Packages General Naming policy
Next by thread: Re: Addon Packages General Naming policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux