> packages in versioned dependencies. Or to specific zero Epoch == no Epoch typo: s/specific/specify/ > in dependencies, which works fine nowadays. "Requires: libfoo >= 0:2.0-5" > > $ rpmdev-vercmp 0:2.0-5 2.0-5 > 0:2.0-5 == 2.0-5 and the sentence is incomplete. What I wanted to add is that nowadays no Epoch and zero Epoch are the same and can be compared to eachother without trouble, whereas years ago such a comparison lead to problems. And, of course, versions in dependencies can get out-of-date, so eventually the packager will need to revisit them and bump them, too. > Drop old "Epoch: 0" definitions in spec files, if you still find some. > Most have been dropped already years ago. > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2005-February/msg00134.html -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
