Re: Against what package do I file this BZ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:34:50PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 08:14:17 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> 
> > There is at least one (likely more) scripts in use for doing mass
> > rebuilds that are incorrectly bumping the release value. I noticed this
> > before and brought it up in IRC but didn't file a bug then.
> > 
> > What's going on is that the script is incrementing the release by 1 but
> > is not rounding off the value. So, for example, from one package I
> > maintain (perl-qpid_proton) I see the following in the %changelog:
> 
> The spec file is bad:
> 
>   Release:        3.1%{?dist}
> 
> This is a non-standard release versioning scheme, and certainly the
> bumpspec script should not mess with that value beyond bumping the
> most-significant number.

I see on the package naming guidelines that this should be 3{?dist}.1.
I'll fix that in my packages for their next release.

> Odd is how the release value has been increased before:
> 
> > * Mon Jul 22 2013 Petr Pisar - 0.4-2.1
> > - Perl 5.18 rebuild
> > 
> > * Mon Apr  1 2013 Darryl L. Pierce - 0.4-1.1
> > - Changed the qpid-proton dependency to qpid-proton-c.
> > - Changed the qpid-proton-devel dependency to qpid-proton-c-devel.
> > 
> > * Fri Mar  1 2013 Darryl L. Pierce - 0.4-1
> > - Rebased on Proton 0.4.
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce <mcpierce@xxxxxxxxx>
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
"What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"

Attachment: pgpNqukJTrQj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux